Sentiment-Aware Stock Market Prediction Using Financial Text and Temporal Deep Learning

Authors

  • Claudio Perkins Department of Computer Science, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA.

Keywords:

financial sentiment analysis; temporal deep learning; stock market prediction; financial text; system architecture; algorithmic governance; model risk

Abstract

Financial market prediction has traditionally relied on quantitative price and volume data, but such representations often ignore the interpretive discourse that shapes investor expectations and trading behavior. This paper presents a system-level examination of sentiment-aware stock market prediction that integrates financial text analysis with temporal deep learning architectures. The study conceptualizes sentiment not as an exogenous indicator but as an intermediate representation derived from heterogeneous textual sources, including news, analyst commentary, regulatory filings, and social media. The system design couples contextual language modeling with recurrent and attention-based temporal learners to capture sequential dependencies in market dynamics. The paper emphasizes structural trade-offs in latency, interpretability, scalability, and data governance. It further examines infrastructure requirements for reliable ingestion, annotation, model retraining, and deployment. Robustness and fairness concerns are analyzed through the lens of distributional shift, noise propagation, and the risk of amplifying existing market asymmetries. Policy implications related to algorithmic trading, disclosure, auditability, and emerging regulatory frameworks are also considered. The discussion argues that sustainable deployment of sentiment-aware prediction requires not only predictive accuracy but also organizational oversight, data provenance, model risk management, and careful alignment with public interest. The paper contributes a systemic framework for designing, deploying, and governing integrated financial text and temporal deep learning systems in modern financial markets.

References

1. Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2011). Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Journal of Computational Science, 2(1), 1–8.

2. Tetlock, P. C. (2007). Giving content to investor sentiment: The role of media in the stock market. Journal of Finance, 62(3), 1139–1168.

3. Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2011). When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10-Ks. Journal of Finance, 66(1), 35–65.

4. Chen, H., De, P., Hu, Y., & Hwang, B. H. (2014). Wisdom of crowds: The value of stock opinions transmitted through social media. Review of Financial Studies, 27(5), 1367–1403.

5. Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780.

6. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 5998–6008.

7. Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), 4171–4186.

8. Araci, D. (2019). FinBERT: Financial sentiment analysis with pre-trained language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.10063.

9. Sirignano, J., & Cont, R. (2019). Universal features of price formation in financial markets: Perspectives from deep learning. Quantitative Finance, 19(9), 1449–1459.

10. Li, Q. (2026). Dynamic Adaptive Attention and Supervised Contrastive Learning: A Novel Hybrid Framework for Text Sentiment Classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.10459.

11. Gu, S., Kelly, B., & Xiu, D. (2020). Empirical asset pricing via machine learning. Review of Financial Studies, 33(5), 2223–2273.

12. Fischer, T., & Krauss, C. (2018). Deep learning with long short-term memory networks for financial market predictions. European Journal of Operational Research, 270(2), 654–669.

13. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning. MIT Press.

14. Kim, Y. (2014). Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 1746–1751.

15. Zhang, Y., & Wallace, B. (2017). A sensitivity analysis of (and practitioners’ guide to) convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), 253–263.

16. Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2014). Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15(1), 1929–1958.

17. Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2015). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2015).

18. Makridakis, S., Spiliotis, E., & Assimakopoulos, V. (2018). Statistical and Machine Learning forecasting methods: Concerns and ways forward. PLOS ONE, 13(3), e0194889.

19. Barocas, S., Hardt, M., & Narayanan, A. (2019). Fairness and Machine Learning: Limitations and Opportunities. fairmlbook.org.

20. European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain union legislative acts. COM(2021) 206 final. EUR-Lex.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-06