Privacy-Preserving On-Device Generative AI for Personalized Healthcare Image Synthesis

Authors

  • Matteo Makinen School of Computing, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
  • Alessandro J. Allen School of Information Technology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
  • Habsen Beyint Department of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA.

Keywords:

privacy-preserving machine learning; generative adversarial networks; diffusion models; edge computing; healthcare image synthesis; federated learning; differential privacy; medical imaging; data governance; personalization

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence is increasingly positioned as a transformative force in medical imaging, offering to produce patient-specific synthetic views that can support augmentation, simulation, education, and rare pathology representation. At the same time, personalized image synthesis creates acute privacy risks because generative models trained on sensitive health data can leak patient-specific visual information. On-device generative AI has emerged as a promising architectural response, preserving data locality while enabling personalization at the edge. This paper provides a system-level analysis of privacy-preserving on-device generative AI for healthcare image synthesis. It examines the structural relationships among learning paradigms, model architectures, edge hardware, privacy mechanisms, governance, fairness, and sustainability. We argue that technical privacy guarantees alone are insufficient without careful attention to deployment context, lifecycle management, and regulatory alignment. The paper discusses federated learning, differential privacy, model compression, hardware-aware generation, and adversarial threats such as membership inference and reconstruction. It further contrasts edge-native generative models with cloud-centric foundation models and considers the implications for energy use, bias amplification, auditability, and patient consent. By integrating perspectives from machine learning, systems engineering, and health policy, the analysis provides a comprehensive framework for designing and evaluating next-generation personalized medical image synthesis systems. The discussion concludes with future research directions that emphasize standardized evaluation, federated benchmarking, sustainable hardware co-design, and governance structures that preserve public trust.

References

1. McMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & Agüera y Arcas, B. (2017). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), 1273–1282.

2. Abadi, M., Chu, A., Goodfellow, I., McMahan, H. B., Mironov, I., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2016). Deep learning with differential privacy. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 308–318.

3. Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adversarial nets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 27, 2672–2680.

4. Ho, J., Jain, A., & Abbeel, P. (2020). Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 6840–6851.

5. Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., & Ommer, B. (2022). High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 10684–10695.

6. Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., Bellet, A., Bennis, M., Bhagoji, A. N., Bonawitz, K., Charles, Z., Cormode, G., Cummings, R., D'Oliveira, R. G. L., Eichner, H., Rouayheb, S. E., Evans, D., Gardner, J., Garrett, Z., Gascón, A., Ghazi, B., Gibbons, P. B., Gruteser, M., Harchaoui, Z., He, C., He, L., Huo, Z., Hutchinson, B., Hsu, J., Jaggi, M., Javidi, T., Joshi, G., Khodak, M., Konečný, J., Korolova, A., Koushanfar, F., Koyejo, S., Lepoint, T., Liu, Y., Mittal, P., Mohri, M., Nock, R., Özgür, A., Pagh, R., Qi, H., Ramage, D., Raskar, R., Raykova, M., Song, D., Song, W., Stich, S. U., Sun, Z., Suresh, A. T., Tramèr, F., Vepakomma, P., Wang, J., Xiong, L., Xu, Z., Yang, Q., Yu, F. X., Yu, H., & Zhao, S. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 14(1–2), 1–210.

7. Sheller, M. J., Edwards, B., Reina, G. A., Martin, J., Pati, S., Kotrotsou, A., Milchenko, M., Xu, W., Marcus, D., Colen, R. R., & Bakas, S. (2020). Federated learning in medicine: Facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data. Scientific Reports, 10, 12598.

8. Kaissis, G. A., Makowski, M. R., Rückert, D., & Braren, R. F. (2020). Secure, privacy-preserving and federated machine learning in medical imaging. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2(6), 305–311.

9. Shokri, R., Stronati, M., Song, C., & Shmatikov, V. (2017). Membership inference attacks against machine learning models. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 3–18.

10. Dwork, C., & Roth, A. (2014). The algorithmic foundations of differential privacy. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science, 9(3–4), 211–407.

11. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015). U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 234–241.

12. Chen, Ce, et al. "JuZhou 1.0 Technical Report: The First Edge-Native Text-to-Image Foundation Model Trained Entirely on China-Developed AI Accelerators." arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.28421 (2026).

13. Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447–453.

14. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1–35.

15. Rajpurkar, P., Chen, E., Banerjee, O., & Topol, E. J. (2022). AI in health and medicine. Nature Medicine, 28(1), 31–38.

16. Isensee, F., Jaeger, P. F., Kohl, S. A. A., Petersen, J., & Maier-Hein, K. H. (2021). nnU-Net: A self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nature Methods, 18(2), 203–211.

17. Papernot, N., McDaniel, P., Sinha, A., & Wellman, M. P. (2018). SoK: Security and privacy in machine learning. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 399–414.

18. Miotto, R., Wang, F., Wang, S., Jiang, X., & Dudley, J. T. (2018). Deep learning for healthcare: Review, opportunities and challenges. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 19(6), 1236–1246.

19. Topol, E. J. (2019). High-performance medicine: The convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine, 25(1), 44–56.

20. European Union. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union, L119, 1–88.

21. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1996). Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996. Public Law 104-191.

22. Ziller, A., Usynin, D., Braren, R., Makowski, M., Rueckert, D., & Kaissis, G. (2021). Medical imaging deep learning with differential privacy. Scientific Reports, 11, 13524.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-22