Deep Learning-Based Spatiotemporal Modeling of Bicycle Crash Risk Using Mobile Sensing and Urban Built Environment Data
Keywords:
bicycle safety, spatiotemporal deep learning, mobile sensing, built environment, urban informatics, algorithmic fairness, system governanceAbstract
Bicycle transportation is increasingly recognized as a sustainable urban mobility mode, yet pervasive safety concerns inhibit realization of its full societal potential. Conventional crash analysis methods rest on aggregate police-reported datasets that suffer from underreporting, spatiotemporal sparseness, and limited characterization of near-miss events. This paper presents a system-level investigation of deep learning architectures designed for spatiotemporal bicycle crash risk modeling by integrating heterogeneous streams of mobile sensing data and detailed urban built environment information. The discussion is oriented around structural trade-offs inherent in sensor fusion, computational graph construction, attention-driven memory mechanisms, and adversarial robustness. Particular emphasis is placed on the governance of large-scale mobility data pipelines, including privacy preservation, algorithmic fairness, infrastructure interoperability, and long-term deployment sustainability. Drawing from cross-domain comparisons with motor vehicle crash prediction and urban flow forecasting, we analyze the interplay between model complexity, interpretability, and real-world policy actionability. We further examine how varying spatial resolutions, temporal update frequencies, and built environment feature encodings influence distributive equity in risk assessments across sociodemographic groups. The paper concludes with an exploration of anticipatory governance frameworks that reconcile the promise of proactive infrastructure safety interventions with the public accountability demands of municipal planning systems, offering a forward-looking perspective on deep learning as an infrastructural component for sustainable urban safety systems.
References
1. Pucher, J., Dill, J., & Handy, S. (2010). Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. Preventive Medicine, 50, S106-S125.
2. Beck, L. F., Dellinger, A. M., & O'Neil, M. E. (2007). Motor vehicle crash injury rates by mode of travel, United States: using exposure-based methods to quantify differences. American Journal of Epidemiology, 166(2), 212-218.
3. Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the built environment: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), 265-294.
4. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436-444.
5. Zhang, J., Zheng, Y., & Qi, D. (2017). Deep spatio-temporal residual networks for citywide crowd flows prediction. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 31(1).
6. Kipf, T. N., & Welling, M. (2017). Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. International Conference on Learning Representations.
7. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30.
8. Najafabadi, M. M., Villanustre, F., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., Seliya, N., Wald, R., & Muharemagic, E. (2015). Deep learning applications and challenges in big data analytics. Journal of Big Data, 2(1), 1-21.
9. Bao, J., Liu, P., Yu, H., & Xu, C. (2019). Incorporating temporal correlation into a deep learning framework for short-term crash occurrence prediction on expressways. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 131, 248-256.
10. Mannering, F. L., & Bhat, C. R. (2014). Analytic methods in accident research: Methodological frontier and future directions. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, 1, 1-22.
11. Dozza, M., & Werneke, J. (2014). Introducing naturalistic cycling data: What factors influence bicyclists' safety? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 24, 83-91.
12. de Montjoye, Y. A., Hidalgo, C. A., Verleysen, M., & Blondel, V. D. (2013). Unique in the Crowd: The privacy bounds of human mobility. Scientific Reports, 3, 1376.
13. Zheng, Y., Capra, L., Wolfson, O., & Yang, H. (2014). Urban computing: concepts, methodologies, and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 5(3), 1-55.
14. Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2016). Big data's disparate impact. California Law Review, 104, 671-732.
15. Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274.
16. Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689-707.
17. Wang, Z., He, S. Y., & Leung, Y. (2018). Applying mobile phone data to travel behaviour research: A literature review. Travel Behaviour and Society, 11, 141-155.
18. Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Long, Y., Bhalla, K., & Ezzati, M. (2025). Assessing bicycle safety risks using emerging mobile sensing data. Travel Behaviour and Society, 38, 100906.
19. Zahabi, S. A. H., Strauss, J., Manaugh, K., & Miranda-Moreno, L. F. (2011). Estimating potential effect of speed limits, built environment, and other factors on severity of pedestrian and cyclist injuries in crashes. Transportation Research Record, 2247(1), 81-90.
20. Yao, H., Tang, X., Wei, H., Zheng, G., & Li, Z. (2019). Revisiting spatial-temporal similarity: A deep learning framework for traffic prediction. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 33, 5666-5673.
21. Zou, Y., Wang, X., & Zhang, D. (2019). Examining the factors influencing pedestrian and cyclist crash frequency by severity using the Conway–Maxwell–Poisson model. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 132, 105284.
22. Wang, J., & Muddassir, A. B. M. (2014). A review of resilience in transportation systems. Transport Reviews, 34(2), 183-208.
23. Pucher, J., & Buehler, R. (2008). Making cycling irresistible: lessons from the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Transport Reviews, 28(4), 495-528.
24. Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 2053951716679679.
25. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Engineering Systems and Digital Innovation

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.