Physics-Informed Large Language Models for Predictive Maintenance and Fault Diagnosis of Renewable Energy Systems
Keywords:
physics-informed large language models, predictive maintenance, fault diagnosis, renewable energy systems, digital twin, federated learning, governanceAbstract
The accelerating global transition toward renewable energy systems introduces unprecedented operational complexity in asset management, where predictive maintenance and fault diagnosis must reconcile high-dimensional sensor streams, physical degradation laws, and stochastic environmental forcing. Conventional data-driven machine learning models often fail under distributional shift, limited fault samples, and the absence of physically grounded reasoning, while purely physics-based approaches struggle to scale across heterogeneous fleets. This paper presents a system-level investigation of physics-informed large language models (LLMs) as a unifying architectural paradigm for maintenance intelligence in wind, solar, and hybrid renewable installations. We examine how the generative and reasoning capabilities of LLMs can be structurally coupled with physics-informed priors—through digital twin surrogates, embedded domain knowledge, and differentiable physical constraints—to enable interpretable anomaly narration, causal fault localization, and context-aware prescriptive guidance. Departing from component-level algorithm design, the analysis emphasizes cross-system trade-offs among model fidelity, computational latency, data governance, and deployment topology. We discuss infrastructure requirements for federated fine-tuning across geographically distributed assets, edge-cloud orchestration, and the integration of real-time supervisory control and data acquisition streams with latent physical representations. Critical attention is devoted to governance challenges, including auditability of LLM-generated maintenance recommendations, fairness in resource allocation across interconnected energy nodes, and the policy implications of delegating diagnostic authority to hybrid neuro-symbolic systems. Robustness under adversarial sensor degradation and concept drift is analyzed alongside sustainability considerations related to model update frequency and carbon-aware inference scheduling. By synthesizing insights from industrial AI, prognostics and health management, and socio-technical systems theory, the paper articulates a forward-looking research agenda for physics-informed LLMs as resilient cognitive infrastructure in next-generation renewable energy operations.
References
1. Lei, Y., Jia, F., Lin, J., Xing, S., & Ding, S. X. (2016). An intelligent fault diagnosis method using unsupervised feature learning towards mechanical big data. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 63(5), 3137–3147.
2. Jiang, G., He, H., Yan, J., & Xie, P. (2019). Multiscale convolutional neural networks for fault diagnosis of wind turbine gearbox. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 66(4), 3196–3207.
3. Lu, W., Liang, B., Cheng, Y., Meng, D., Yang, J., & Zhang, T. (2017). Deep model based domain adaptation for fault diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 64(3), 2296–2305.
4. Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019). Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 378, 686–707.
5. Yucesan, Y. A., & Viana, F. A. C. (2021). A hybrid physics-informed neural network for prognostics of rolling element bearings. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 154, 107572.
6. Madaan, A., Tandon, N., Gupta, P., Hallinan, S., Gao, L., Wiegreffe, S., ... & Clark, P. (2022). Think about it: Towards structured reasoning with language models. Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 4413–4425.
7. Zhao, Z., Wu, J., Li, T., Sun, C., Yan, R., & Chen, X. (2024). Large language model-based intelligent maintenance assistant for complex industrial systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 20(2), 2184–2194.
8. Lewis, P., Perez, E., Piktus, A., Petroni, F., Karpukhin, V., Goyal, N., ... & Kiela, D. (2020). Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 9459–9474.
9. Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., ... & Zhou, D. (2022). Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 24824–24837.
10. Tao, F., Zhang, H., Liu, A., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2019). Digital twin in industry: State-of-the-art. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 15(4), 2405–2415.
11. Li, T., Sahu, A. K., Talwalkar, A., & Smith, V. (2020). Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 37(3), 50–60.
12. Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., & Le, Q. V. (2014). Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 27, 3104–3112.
13. Fischer, K., Besnard, F., & Bertling, L. (2012). Reliability-centered maintenance for wind turbines based on statistical analysis and practical experience. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 27(1), 184–192.
14. Fan, D., Liu, M., Shao, Y., Yang, L., Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., ... & Wang, Z. (2025). Domain-Specific Large Language Model for Maintenance Decision-Making on Wind Farms by Labeled-Data-Supervised Fine-Tuning. Engineering.
15. Yang, W., Tavner, P. J., Crabtree, C. J., Feng, Y., & Qiu, Y. (2014). Wind turbine condition monitoring: Technical and commercial challenges. Wind Energy, 17(5), 673–693.
16. Jardine, A. K. S., Lin, D., & Banjevic, D. (2006). A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 20(7), 1483–1510.
17. Khan, S., & Yairi, T. (2018). A review on the application of deep learning in system health management. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 107, 241–265.
18. Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610–623.
19. Selvaraju, R. R., Cogswell, M., Das, A., Vedantam, R., Parikh, D., & Batra, D. (2017). Grad-CAM: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 618–626.
20. Patterson, D., Gonzalez, J., Le, Q., Liang, C., Munguia, L.-M., Rothchild, D., ... & Dean, J. (2021). Carbon emissions and large neural network training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.10350.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Engineering Systems and Digital Innovation

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.