Intelligent Enterprise Knowledge Management via Domain-Specific Retrieval-Augmented Generation and User-Centric Query Understanding

Authors

  • Tejas L. Mistry School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
  • Zhonglin Tian Department of Computer Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.

Keywords:

retrieval-augmented generation, enterprise knowledge management, query understanding, domain-specific AI, governance, fairness, large language models

Abstract

Modern enterprises face an escalating challenge in managing and leveraging vast, heterogeneous knowledge repositories while ensuring that information retrieval and synthesis align precisely with end-user intent. This paper presents a systemic examination of intelligent enterprise knowledge management through the synthesis of domain-specific retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and user-centric query understanding. We propose a conceptual architecture that integrates fine-grained query interpretation, contextual disambiguation, and dynamic retrieval from curated document bases with large language model (LLM) generation to produce accurate, traceable, and contextually grounded responses. The discussion extends beyond algorithmic design to encompass the structural trade-offs between retrieval precision and generative fluency, the governance of proprietary knowledge, infrastructure scalability, and deployment sustainability. We analyze how user-centric query modeling—incorporating role-based, task-oriented, and temporal signals—can mitigate hallucinations and improve relevance in high-stakes enterprise settings. Further, we address cross-domain fairness, robustness against distributional shifts, and the policy implications of automated knowledge synthesis. Through a multidisciplinary lens, we explore how RAG systems can be hardened for production through continuous feedback loops, audit trails, and ethical guardrails. The paper contributes a holistic framework for designing knowledge management systems that balance generative capability with retrieval accountability, ensuring that enterprises can harness AI-driven insights without sacrificing reliability, compliance, or user trust. We conclude with a roadmap for future research that emphasizes human-in-the-loop validation, federated knowledge indexing, and the alignment of retrieval objectives with organizational values.

References

1. Lewis, P., Perez, E., Piktus, A., Petroni, F., Karpukhin, V., Goyal, N., ... & Kiela, D. (2020). Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 9459–9474.

2. Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 610–623).

3. Lewis, P., Perez, E., Piktus, A., Petroni, F., Karpukhin, V., Goyal, N., ... & Kiela, D. (2020). Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 9459–9474.

4. Jiang, J., He, P., Chen, W., Liu, X., Gao, J., & Zhao, T. (2023). A survey on retrieval-augmented text generation for large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.15268.

5. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.

6. Mitra, B., & Craswell, N. (2018). An introduction to neural information retrieval. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 13(1), 1–126.

7. Ji, Z., Lee, N., Frieske, R., Yu, T., Su, D., Xu, Y., ... & Fung, P. (2023). Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(12), 1–38.

8. Trivedi, H., Balasubramanian, N., Khot, T., & Sabharwal, A. (2022). Interleaving retrieval with chain-of-thought reasoning for knowledge-intensive multi-step questions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10509.

9. Shao, Z., Gong, Y., Shen, Y., Huang, M., Duan, N., & Chen, W. (2023). Enhancing retrieval-augmented large language models with iterative retrieval-generation synergy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.15294.

10. Bennett, P. N., White, R. W., Chu, W., Dumais, S. T., Bailey, P., Borisyuk, F., & Cui, X. (2012). Modeling the impact of short- and long-term behavior on search personalization. In Proceedings of the 35th International ACM SIGIR Conference (pp. 185–194).

11. Li, J., Sun, A., Han, J., & Li, Y. (2022). A survey on deep learning for task-oriented dialogue systems. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 33(10), 4573–4595.

12. Gao, L., Madaan, A., Zhou, S., Alon, U., Liu, P., Yang, Y., ... & Neubig, G. (2023). PAL: Program-aided language models. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 10764–10794).

13. Khattab, O., & Zaharia, M. (2020). ColBERT: Efficient and effective passage search via contextualized late interaction over BERT. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference (pp. 39–48).

14. Yu, X. (2026, January). AI-Driven Personalization across Domains for Local Categorical Query Understanding and Context-Aware Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Digital Media Technology and Social Computing (pp. 77-82).

15. Felzmann, H., Villaronga, E. F., Lutz, C., & Tamò-Larrieux, A. (2019). Transparency you can trust: Transparency requirements for artificial intelligence between legal norms and contextual concerns. Big Data & Society, 6(1), 2053951719860542.

16. Schwartz, R., Dodge, J., Smith, N. A., & Etzioni, O. (2020). Green AI. Communications of the ACM, 63(12), 54–63.

17. Amershi, S., Weld, D., Vorvoreanu, M., Fourney, A., Nushi, B., Collisson, P., ... & Horvitz, E. (2019). Guidelines for human-AI interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–13).

18. Hulten, G. (2018). Building intelligent systems: A guide to machine learning engineering. Apress.

19. Carlini, N., Tramer, F., Wallace, E., Jagielski, M., Herbert-Voss, A., Lee, K., ... & Raffel, C. (2021). Extracting training data from large language models. In 30th USENIX Security Symposium (pp. 2633–2650).

20. Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1–35.

21. Kirkpatrick, J., Pascanu, R., Rabinowitz, N., Veness, J., Desjardins, G., Rusu, A. A., ... & Hadsell, R. (2017). Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(13), 3521–3526.

22. European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). COM/2021/206 final.

23. Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., Milletari, F., Roth, H. R., Albarqouni, S., ... & Cardoso, M. J. (2020). The future of digital health with federated learning. NPJ Digital Medicine, 3, 119.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-08